Systems Producer, Fort Worth. I design the rules an AI runs inside, the part underneath the prompts. GateForce85 is the first working example: a job-fit scoring engine that audits postings, never people.
We talk about the divide as though everyone is standing at the same starting line, waiting for an AI account. Start earlier. Does someone have a reliable device, internet access, transportation, time to learn, and somewhere to ask for help? Can they reach the job we're celebrating? Can a small nonprofit afford the staff time to check the work its new AI subscription produces?
A marble palace and a shack of rotting wood can both have freshly painted shutters. The paint tells us very little about what either house can withstand.
Human Capacity Infrastructure is the operating layer between buying AI and institutionalizing it: the rules, review layers, source-of-truth systems, and decision gates that keep the work aligned and usable. Two priorities right now. GateForce85 first. Then a working group for AI implementation in local government and public trust institutions, where the people who know the work, technical practitioners, designers, legal counsel, and funders make practical decisions together.
Some call this prompt engineering, AI governance, LLM evaluation, or workflow architecture. I call it Systems Producer, because the job is producing the operating system around the AI.
GateForce85 status: working browser prototype, pre-pilot. Internal review was model-assisted. One outside code review, done in a personal capacity with no institutional endorsement. It covered the code, not field results. Not yet field-tested.
The asks right now: three to five workforce advisors for a two-week calibration lab on synthetic cases, and people who know the work of local government and public trust institutions for the working group. Message me on LinkedIn.
GateForce85 overview (PDF)
Systems Producer resume (PDF)
Band-Aids, Six Sigma, and Fire Codes: the Human Capacity Infrastructure explainer
The ask right now: three to five workforce advisors for a two-week calibration lab. Advisors score synthetic postings against synthetic seeker profiles. The question: do the engine's verdicts match what an experienced advisor would tell that seeker? Exit is GO, REVISE, or STOP. If you advise job seekers, this is the piece you could help with.
Later, the field pilot: ten to twenty participants over six weeks, a counselor present at each scoring session. The question: does the verdict change what a seeker applies to, and does it hold up against what happens next? That stage needs a host organization, a named operational owner, a technical partner, limited specialist review, and an evaluator.
I lead both stages as builder and Systems Producer. Message me on LinkedIn to help with either piece.
Fort Worth-based producer who brings evaluative, operational, creative, and governance thinking to a single engagement. Defines requirements, builds the structure, and makes sure the final product holds up.
Background across national TV, city government, nonprofit, and civic organizations. Designs evaluation engines, governance frameworks, and decision systems. Translates ambiguity into decisions, owners, and deadlines. Reads people and organizational dynamics as clearly as project requirements.
Message me through LinkedIn for information on the pilot or my other work.